So, because of the bad job this author did, I have to assume, that any scientific case still has to be made and until that happens I will conclude that transgender people are not born that way as there still is no scientific evidence to the contrary. If this article was supposed to be scientific, it’s laughable, just a string of assumptions of “may be” or “appears to be”, no scientist would take this serious if they were worth their salt.Īnd no, I have no hatred for transgender people and I do think they should be treated no different, but it is very obvious, that if this article is the pinnacle of “science” supposedly proving that transgender people are biologically transgender born, it did a disservice for anyone with half a brain. Sources please and proof that these claims are unfounded.Īs usual, completely biased diatribe not a single shred of scientific proof. Pure assumptions, that’s not science, not a single objective proof given.Įnvironmental inluences, it claims, have been widely disclaimed? That it APPEARS that in the womb transgender fetuses MAY have been exposed to insufficient levels of estrogen. They admit that the fact that transgender people, depending on how they identify, take testosterone or estrogen which MAY askew the findings. They offer up some theory that gender MAY be influenced by hormones. Science cannot be “fitted”, it either is or isn’t, that’s the whole point calling it science.

For an in-depth look at how disagreements over restroom usage has shaped policy, check out this Politico article.For a more complete discussion on queer acronyms, see this description from BBC news.For a review of discrimination against transgender persons, see this report from the National Center for Transgender Equality.For a quantitative view of transgenderism in the US, take a look at this analysis from Times Union.For a SITN blog article discussing sex determination, check out “I’m XY and I Know It”: Sex determination systems 101.We also encourage you to explore additional resources on this topic: Should transvestic fetishism be classified in DSM 5? Recommendations from the WPATH consensus process for revision of the diagnosis of transvestic fetishism.The (CA)n polymorphism of ERβ gene is associated with FtM Transsexualism.White matter microstructure in female to male transsexuals before cross-sex hormone treatment: A diffusion tensor imaging study.Regional gray matter variation in male-to-female transsexualism.Changing your sex changes your brain: influence of testosterone and estrogen on adult human brain structure.A sex difference in the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus: relationship to gender identity.Male-to-female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus.A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality.Transsexuality among twins: Identity concordance, transition, rearing, and orientation.We still believe in the value of rigorous scientific research about transgender identity and encourage you to read the published, peer-reviewed studies that we cited in the original article if you are interested in learning more about this topic (linked below): As such, we decided to remove this article in 2021 to prevent its further misappropriation by individuals and groups seeking to oversimplify this complex subject and promote views that lack a scientific basis. Regrettably, both the text and the figures in this article were being abused by those seeking to support their own beliefs. In the wake of this legislation, Between the (Gender) Lines: The Science of Transgender Identity explored what was known at the time about transgender identity, discussing scientific evidence for its biological bases, as well as the social and psychological ramifications of binary gender classifications. In 2016, a controversial bill was signed in Georgia, banning transgender individuals from using restrooms designated for the sex with which they identify.

Mew legend maker 10 92